Dear Colleagues,
We have a total of 743 comments received
against D1.0.
The comment break down by clause is shown
below.
|
Clause
|
Technical*
|
Editorial
|
Total
|
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
3
|
|
1
|
0
|
12
|
12
|
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
1
|
9
|
10
|
|
4
|
8
|
3
|
11
|
|
5
|
33
|
20
|
53
|
|
6
|
45
|
30
|
75
|
|
7
|
8
|
2
|
10
|
|
8
|
87
|
47
|
134
|
|
9
|
97
|
38
|
135
|
|
10
|
59
|
18
|
77
|
|
11
|
34
|
9
|
43
|
|
12
|
90
|
20
|
110
|
|
13
|
62
|
6
|
68
|
|
|
525
|
218
|
743
|
(* The number of Technical comments is
likely to further
increase, as editors are required to reclassify Editorial
comments that propose
technical change into Technical comments.)
A note on editorial comments:
At the meeting, we will try to accept all
editorial comments
in bulk. Accepting in bulk means that resolutions to all
editorial comments that
editors proposed will be accepted by a single motion. To make
sure that no
wrong or undesired changes are made to the draft, it is
important for everyone
to review the editorial comments and the proposed resolutions.
If you have any
disagreement or a concern about the proposed resolution,
please inform Chief
editor that the comment in question should be discussed
individually and not
processed in bulk. Hopefully, there will not be too many such
cases.
A note on technical comments:
It will be very challenging to resolve 525
technical
comments (available meeting time only allows 2.5 minutes per
comment on average),
while ensuring that due technical consideration is given to
each comment.
Considering that it is quite likely that we
will not have
time to resolve all comments, I suggest that we organize our
comment resolution
such that we at least cover one key clause for each task
force. This way, even
if we run out of time, at least we will have a number of
completely resolved
clauses that will allow us to produce D1.1 (at least for these
clauses), while
the rest of clauses and remaining unresolved comments will
simply carry over to
the next draft.
Therefore in the proposed agenda, I ordered
clauses as
follows:
Day 1:
1.
C5 and 5A
2.
C6 and 6A
3.
C9 and 9A
4.
C0-C4 (if we have time,
otherwise move to later days)
Day 2:
1.
C8
2.
C12
3.
C10
Day 3:
1.
C11
2.
C13
3.
C7
The proposed agenda is posted here: http://www.ieee1904.org/1/meeting_info/siepon_1012_agenda.pdf
As always, I welcome all suggestions for
improvement.
Thank you,
Glen