RE: Radio over Ethernet draft PAR for the IEEE 1904 pre-review & discussion
Jouni,
I believe you should clearly state what the intent is and what the scope of
the project will be. I think you have pretty much an idea of what needs to
be done and you can be very specific in the PAR.
MArek
-----Original Message-----
From: Jouni Korhonen [mailto:jouni.korhonen@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2014 12:51 PM
To: Marek Hajduczenia; 'AshwoodsmithPeter'; 'Hesham ElBakoury'; Glen Kramer;
'STDS-1904-WG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: RE: Radio over Ethernet draft PAR for the IEEE 1904 pre-review &
discussion
Marek,
For the below comment, which specific part(s) of the text you consider
having convoluted/vague statements? We'll have to fix those to avoid
confusion and misunderstanding.
- Jouni
> -----Original Message-----
> From: stds-1904-wg@xxxxxxxx [mailto:stds-1904-wg@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Marek Hajduczenia
> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 10:38 PM
> To: 'AshwoodsmithPeter'; 'Hesham ElBakoury'; Glen Kramer; 'STDS-1904-
> WG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> Subject: RE: Radio over Ethernet draft PAR for the IEEE 1904
> pre-review & discussion
>
> I believe the draft PAR proposal should make it then clear what the
> intent is, and avoid convoluted statements. Remember that people
> reading and voting on it in larger IEEE might not have sufficient
> background to understand all finer details of what you're trying to do.
>
> Being vague does not help getting projects approved.
>
> Marek
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: stds-1904-wg@xxxxxxxx [mailto:stds-1904-wg@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of AshwoodsmithPeter
> Sent: Monday, October 6, 2014 3:33 PM
> To: AshwoodsmithPeter; Hesham ElBakoury; Glen Kramer; STDS-1904-
> WG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Radio over Ethernet draft PAR for the IEEE 1904
> pre-review & discussion
>
> Oh, I should add that this proposal is not looking at making changes
> to Ethernet to support CPRI, simply how the encapsulation would work.
> The presentation to the IEEE 802.1 was to bring up the extremely
> challenging transport requirements which are independent of the
encapsulation.
>
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: stds-1904-wg@xxxxxxxx [mailto:stds-1904-wg@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of AshwoodsmithPeter
> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 3:29 PM
> To: Hesham ElBakoury; Glen Kramer; STDS-1904-WG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Radio over Ethernet draft PAR for the IEEE 1904
> pre-review & discussion
>
> Thanks Hesham,
>
> We are happy to answer questions on the proposal. If people are
> interested I made a presentation to the IEEE a few months ago to
> discuss the possibility/requirements. The presentation is available here:
>
> http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2014/new-ashwood-tsn-cpri-
> fronthau
> l-0714-v03.pdf
>
> There is a link in there to the CPRI specification which has much more
> low level detail and if you Google things like "C-RAN" and "Fronthaul"
> there is a lot more information out there.
>
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: stds-1904-wg@xxxxxxxx [mailto:stds-1904-wg@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Hesham ElBakoury
> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 3:21 PM
> To: Glen Kramer; STDS-1904-WG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Radio over Ethernet draft PAR for the IEEE 1904
> pre-review & discussion
>
> I have attached a clarification on this project from my Colleague
> Peter Ashwoodsmith.
>
> Thanks
>
> Hesham
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hesham ElBakoury
> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 11:42 AM
> To: 'Glen Kramer'; STDS-1904-WG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Radio over Ethernet draft PAR for the IEEE 1904
> pre-review & discussion
>
> Glen,
>
> Is there a presentation that describes what this project aims to
> achieve (e.g. do they want to encapsulate OFDM symbol data in Ethernet
> frames ?) and why they think 1904 is the right standard group to work on
this project ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Hesham
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: stds-1904-wg@xxxxxxxx [mailto:stds-1904-wg@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Glen Kramer
> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 11:16 AM
> To: STDS-1904-WG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: FW: Radio over Ethernet draft PAR for the IEEE 1904
> pre-review & discussion
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> I have received the following request for Radio-over-Ethernet (RoE)
> project to be formed under 1904 WG. The draft PAR is attached.
> We will vote on this PAR at the next meeting. Meanwhile, I encourage
> everyone to review and discuss the draft PAR on the reflector. Feel
> free to contact PAR authors with any questions, or if you want your
> name to be added as a supporter.
>
> If approved, this PAR will become 1904.3 project.
>
> Thank you,
> Glen
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jouni Korhonen
> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 12:00 AM
> To: Glen Kramer
> Cc: Zongying He; Jay (James) Teborek; duanran@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> cuichunfeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; liu.qiong@xxxxxxxxxx;
> Patrice.Plante@xxxxxxxxxx; zhang.boshan@xxxxxxxxxx;
> satoru.matsushima@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; tero.mustala@xxxxxxx;
> huangjinri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Peter.AshwoodSmith@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Radio over Ethernet draft PAR for the IEEE 1904 pre-review &
> discussion
>
> Dear chair of the IEEE 1904 ANWG,
>
> Please see the attached draft version of the PAR for Radio over
> Ethernet
> (RoE) standardization effort that we (the individuals in the CC list)
> seek to pursue under the IEEE 1904 ANWG. We welcome a review and
> comments from
> 1904 members on the current draft version of the PAR. We intend to
> present this PAR in the forthcoming 1904 meeting in Wuhan to drive our
> cause, which means we also ask for a presentation slot in the forthcoming
1904 meeting agenda.
>
> Should there be any additional backup material prior the meeting,
> please let us know. If there are any other matters we should be aware of
just let us know.
>
> Best regards,
> Jouni (on behalf of the PAR preparation team)
>
>
> --
> Jouni Korhonen
> CTO Office, Networking
> Broadcom